A judge has dismissed the rapper Drake’s defamation lawsuit targeting Universal Music Group concerning Kendrick Lamar's song the diss record.
Judge the court’s judge ruled that the rapper’s song lyrics, which claimed Drake and his associates of being "certified paedophiles", were "protected opinion" and could not be deemed libelous.
The Canadian rapper submitted the legal action in early this year, claiming Universal Music Group, the record label representing the two rappers, of defamation by permitting the song to be published and marketed, saying it spread a "false and malicious narrative".
The artist’s representative said he planned to appeal the decision. Universal Music Group said it was pleased with the result and was eager to resuming its collaboration with the rapper.
Not Like Us, which was initially released in spring 2024, was broadly viewed as the decisive blow in an ongoing battle between the rival rappers.
It has become the biggest hit of Lamar's career, having received five Grammys and being one of the most-discussed moments of his Super Bowl performance in early 2025.
In a 38-page order, the judge called the row between the artists "the most infamous rap battle in the genre's history".
"The artists' seven-track rap battle was a 'war of words' that was the subject of extensive press coverage and digital debate," the judge noted.
"Although the claim that plaintiff is a child predator is undoubtedly a grave allegation, the wider backdrop of a heated rap battle, with incendiary language and offensive accusations hurled by both participants, would not lead the average audience to believe that 'the track' conveys truthful statements about plaintiff."
She additionally observed that, in an earlier song, Drake had "challenged his rival to make the paedophilia accusations" that featured in the diss record.
On the song his own release, Drake used the synthetic vocals of Tupac Shakur to suggest strategies on how to prevail in the feud.
"Suggest he has a preference for minors, consider that a tip," the song proposed.
"Against this backdrop in which such lyrics as 'Say, Drake, I hear you like 'em young' must be assessed," stated the court.
"The parallel in the phrasing strongly indicates that this line is a clear reference to Drake's lyrics in the prior song."
Drake, whose real name is Aubrey Drake Graham, did not name Lamar in the lawsuit.
His lawyers accused the label of initiating "an effort to generate a popular song" out of a release that made the "untrue claim that the artist is a criminal paedophile, and to imply that the audience should turn to vigilante justice in retaliation".
Deciding against Drake, Judge Vargas said fans would not expect "truthful accounts" from a musical attack "replete with profanity, trash-talking, threats of violence, and figurative and hyperbolic language."
She pointed out that the rapper himself had used comparable rhetoric, quoting a lyric in which the star "heavily" implied that "his opponent is a spouse beater", and another where he "raps that he 'was told' that one of his rival’s children may not be his biological offspring."
Concerning Lamar's song, the court said: "Although apparent statements of fact may assume the character of statements of opinion... when made in public debate, intense arguments, or other circumstances in which an listener may anticipate the use of slurs, fiery rhetoric or exaggeration."
Reacting to the rejection, a label representative said: "From the outset, this case was an affront to all artists and their artistic freedom and never should have seen the light of day."
"We are satisfied with the judge’s ruling and are eager to resuming our partnership successfully marketing Drake's music and supporting his artistic path," the representative continued.
A representative for Drake said the rapper intended to contest the ruling, "and we look forward to the Court of Appeals reviewing it".
Lamar has not yet comment on the case.
A seasoned gaming analyst with over a decade of experience in casino strategy and responsible gambling advocacy.