On a Sunday afternoon in 1996, a single attacker using semi-automatic rifles murdered 35 people in the Tasmanian tourist destination of Port Arthur.
That national tragedy nearly a generation ago, which ushered in some of the strictest weapons policies in the world, can seem like a bygone age for many residents.
However, the tragedy in Bondi this past Sunday, which left 15 dead, has brought back painful recollections of the Port Arthur massacre.
A study released earlier this year revealed that there are now over four million weapons owned by civilians across the country – a figure that is roughly two times the amount from two decades prior.
This means approximately one gun for every seven Australians.
While Queensland has the largest arsenal, followed by NSW and the state of Victoria, it is Tasmania and the Northern Territory that have the most guns per person.
The data also contradicts the popular notion that guns are mainly owned by people in regional areas.
Firearms are prevalent in cities and their outskirts, with a sizable percentage located in major cities.
Critically, there are now more guns in fewer hands, with the registered individual possessing over four firearms.
Gun control laws in Australia are varied across the country, with a mixed implementation of rules in various regions.
Generally, to obtain a gun licence, an individual must be of legal age, deemed a "fit and proper person", pass a training and safety course, and provide a "genuine reason" for ownership.
The permitted justifications include sport shooting or animal management, marksmanship, certain job-related needs, and as a hobby.
However, significant shortcomings remain. For instance, minors in some areas can have use of a firearm from as young as pre-teen age.
Following the Port Arthur massacre, a sweeping overhaul of national gun laws was enacted, leading to a large-scale surrender scheme of over 650,000 firearms.
Certain types of firearms were prohibited, and background checks alongside mandatory cooling-off periods for sales were introduced.
A key tenet of these reforms was the elimination of "self-defence" as a valid reason for gun ownership.
In the immediate aftermath the Bondi shooting, political leaders were forceful about the need to strengthen gun laws.
A weapons collection initiative was proposed, marking the largest such effort since 1996.
Other proposals now under consideration include:
There are also calls for ongoing evaluations of existing licence holders, acknowledging that "people's circumstances can change" over time.
These swift actions have met with opposition from some quarters.
Pro-gun advocates maintain that imposing caps would not have prevented an attack driven by radicalisation.
They suggest that resources would be better spent improving intelligence rather than restricting lawful owners for the vast majority of responsible owners.
Furthermore, a key proposed reform from 1996 – a country-wide gun database – remains unfinished, though it has now been listed as a key project.
For long-time advocates, the Bondi attack is a tragic indication that gun laws must be updated with technological advances.
They argue that modernisation is needed to "remain effective" and safeguard communities.
While mass shootings remain uncommon in Australia compared to some nations, the threat persists, and the legacy of firearms circulating illegally – through theft – continues to pose a danger.
As one advocate stated, "It is unfortunate that it needs such a loss of life to get people to wake up and take notice."
A seasoned gaming analyst with over a decade of experience in casino strategy and responsible gambling advocacy.