In the aftermath of the horrific incident at Bondi, Australia is confronting several critical reckonings. There is a much-needed national focus on anti-Jewish sentiment, an ongoing concern about national security, and inquiries about the way such an tragedy could happen. But, as viewed of a health professional and Australian Jew, the paramount discussion we are finally having revolves around firearms.
Public health specialists have been issuing warnings about guns for a minimum of a ten-year period. In the wake of the Port Arthur tragedy, Australians united and enacted a series of measures to curb gun violence nationwide. And it worked. Before 1996, the nation experienced roughly one large-scale firearm incident per year. Over the following years, there have been extremely rare major events, with none approaching the fatalities of the incidents in the 1980s and 1990s.
Amidst the Bondi events, the nation's gun laws were not entirely useless. Reports indicate the alleged attackers possessed with bolt-action rifles and a straight-pull shotgun. These firearms can only fire a one round at a time, necessitating a manual operation to chamber the subsequent shot. Although these guns are capable of being discharged rapidly with lethal results, they remain far slower and more cumbersome than the high-capacity, self-loading rifles frequently used in international mass shootings. The number of deaths at Bondi would've been far higher if different firearms had been accessible.
Stopping another Bondi demands unity across all states. And unfortunately, there are already cracks in the facade.
Yet, the horrific toll of the incident demonstrates that current gun laws are failing. Designed in the late 1990s with the noblest aims, decades have eroded their efficacy. Concerningly, there are now more firearms in Australia than before the Port Arthur massacre, with some citizens in cities reportedly holding arsenals of hundreds of weapons.
We have been overconfident and it has cost us terribly.
In the time after the Bondi attack, there have been multiple declarations regarding strengthened firearm legislation. New South Wales in particular will shortly enact a suite of reforms to reduce the public danger posed by firearms. The national government has proposed a new firearm surrender scheme, and there is hope for a countrywide gun database, notwithstanding the complexities of aligning state and federal jurisdictions.
These measures are feasible if the nation works together. As stated, when it comes to firearm laws, the country is dependent on its weakest link. This is the very nature of the Australian federation – laws in one state are much less meaningful if they can be bypassed with a short drive across a state line.
There is the inevitable argument that "firearms are not the killers, individuals are". This is true in the identical way that planes don't transport people, aviators do. Yes, aircraft require operators, but it would be virtually impossible for a pilot to move 500 people internationally without the plane. The mass slaughter seen at Bondi would be extremely difficult without firearms, and would have been far less damaging if the accused individuals had not had access to the weapons they used.
It is acknowledged there are valid needs for some Australians to possess guns. Farm work or culling pests in rural areas is incredibly hard without them. A complete removal of firearms from the country is not feasible, as in certain contexts they are essential tools.
What we can do – the imperative action – is to ensure that gun laws are updated to accurately reflect the society we live in today. Australia's laws have historically been the envy of the world, but the passage of years has done its work and the nation is less secure as it previously was. It is critical to learn from the tragedy of Bondi to heart, and make certain that coming Australians are as protected as past generations have been.
A friend remarked after the Bondi events, "things like this just don't happen here". They don't, but only because the country has made concerted efforts to maintain its security. However horrific as the incident was, there is an aspiration that it can become the last one the nation ever sees.
A seasoned gaming analyst with over a decade of experience in casino strategy and responsible gambling advocacy.